Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
7 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Personal Auto (7)
Content Type
Lit Watch (7)
Travelers won a case defending the validity of its "Other Insurance" clause and enforcement of a stated UIM limit.
A man was hit by a car while riding his low-speed electric scooter and sought no-fault coverage as a pedestrian.
The policyholders tried to argue that the allegations of negligence against them overrode application of the motor vehicle exclusion in their homeowners policy.
A historic case from 1971.
The justices explicitly held that a policy was illusory when the coverage actually afforded by a policy was "extremely minimal and afford[ed] no realistic protection to any group or class of injured persons."
The auto insurer refused coverage for an injury incurred while exiting a vehicle.
When two policies are involved in an auto loss, which policy provides coverage?