Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
8 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Personal Auto (8)
Content Type
Lit Watch (8)
Legal Radar Practice Area
The policyholders tried to argue that the allegations of negligence against them overrode application of the motor vehicle exclusion in their homeowners policy.
A historic case from 1971.
Travelers won a case defending the validity of its "Other Insurance" clause and enforcement of a stated UIM limit.
A man was hit by a car while riding his low-speed electric scooter and sought no-fault coverage as a pedestrian.
A young woman was listed as a "covered insured" on the declarations page of her father's auto policy.
The justices explicitly held that a policy was illusory when the coverage actually afforded by a policy was "extremely minimal and afford[ed] no realistic protection to any group or class of injured persons."
The auto insurer refused coverage for an injury incurred while exiting a vehicle.
When two policies are involved in an auto loss, which policy provides coverage?