Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
55 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Content Type
Historical Lit Watch (55)
Personal Lines
The named insured can speak for all other insureds when it comes to coverage and the limitations of coverage.
Duty to Defend—State Case Law May 16, 2016 A State-by-State Summary Summary: We noted in another discussion (see Duty to Defend…
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that unregistered driver exclusions in auto insurance policies do not violate public policy or the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (PMVFR).
South Dakota court rules that insurer had no duty to defend a claim against insured based on alienation of affection. The insured's actions were no accident and so, were not insurable.
The court found in favor of a Texas condominium association holding that despite an applicable exclusion, the association is entitled to damages for boat slips destroyed during Hurricane Harvey.
A complaint failed to trigger a duty to defend because it failed to state any facts that could give rise to a claim covered by the policy.
This case deals with the insured's expectations based on certain policy forms.
When an insurer relied solely on its own physician's opinion, giving no weight to the insureds' treating physician, the court determined that the issue of bad faith should be decided by a jury.
The Eleventh Circuit has found that the lower court did not err in finding coverage for damages that a condominium complex suffered as a result of Hurricane Irma, nor did the court err in only awarding a fraction of the amount sought by the Condominium Association.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, reversing a district court's decision, has ruled that the term “resident” in a divorced mother's homeowners' insurance policy was ambiguous for purposes of coverage of a lawsuit against her for negligently storing a handgun her son used to commit murder.