X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

March 18, 2019 The Court of Appeals of Washington determined that not giving weight to the opinions of the insureds doctors when they opposed the insurer’s doctors was a decision made in bad faith. The case is Leahy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 Wash. App. 2d 613, 418 P.3d 175 (2018).

Shannon Leahy suffered some soft tissue injuries when her car was struck from behind. The other driver was at fault, but only had a $25,000 liability insurance limit that was split between 3 injured parties. Leahy only received $9,128.50 from the other drivers insurance. Leahy had insurance through State Farm with $25,000 in personal injury protection and $100,000 in UIM coverage. She received medical treatment for her injuries.

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When the Rug Needs to Dry ›

When the drying process of an oriental rug leads to damage, is there coverage?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.