Search FCS
Free Trial Sign In
 

10th Circuit Finds Term “Resident” to be Ambiguous in Homeowners’ Policy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, reversing a district court’s decision, has ruled that the term “resident” in a divorced mother’s homeowners’ insurance policy was ambiguous for purposes of coverage of a lawsuit against her for negligently storing a handgun her son used to commit murder.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

May 6, 2019

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Request a Free Trial today to enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Trusted, quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email customerservice@nuco.com.

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Coverage For Damages When Theft Exclusion Is On Policy ›

Questions coverage for damages that occurred during break-in when the theft exclusion is on the policy.

Question of the Week Archive ›

Weekly Highlights

Litigation Watch ›
Fraud of the Week ›

Fast Things You Need To Know

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.