10th Circuit Finds Term “Resident” to be Ambiguous in Homeowners’ Policy
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, reversing a district court’s decision, has ruled that the term “resident” in a divorced mother’s homeowners’ insurance policy was ambiguous for purposes of coverage of a lawsuit against her for negligently storing a handgun her son used to commit murder.
May 06, 2019 at 06:00 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
May 6, 2019
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Request a Free Trial today to enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Trusted, quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email customerservice@nuco.com.
FC&S Editors
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.