Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
156 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Content Type
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
The employer claimed the man's injuries weren't compensable because he had not arrived at the employer's premises at the time of injury. The man asserted he was performing work-related duties as assigned and directed by the employer when the collision occurred.
The ambiguity in a catch-all exclusion could not be resolved using the principle of ejusdem generis.
The 4th Circuit has ruled that damage caused by a watermain break that was concurrent with a flood is subject to a flood sublimit under an "anti-concurrent" causation clause in the property policy.
Despite a perceived ambiguity, the parties disagreeing on the definition of policy terms does not mean that the policy is ambiguous.
The court decided in favor of an insured, reaffirming the broad duty to defend in New York and recognizing that in some cases, more than one carrier can have a duty to defend.
If there is potential for coverage, the insurer must defend.
The Court of Appeals of Michigan found a tow truck driver was not occupying the vehicle while he was operating the truck's control levers.
Two commonly used exclusions have been found to not apply in cases in which the government is investigating the insured under the False Claims Act.
An E&O insurer obligated to defend an insured sought to recover some of the defense costs from the carrier that issued the insured's CGL policy.
Ozy executives may be covered by D&O insurance despite impersonating Youtube executives with potential Ozy investors.