Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
153 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Content Type
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
Recognizing that it's conclusion was at odds with courts across the country, the California Court of Appeal found that an insured adequately pled a claim of direct physical loss or damage due to the presence of the COVID-19 virus on an insured property.
Pickup truck - vehicle or could it be mobile equipment?
Every California buyer's agent will tell you that they do not have a statutory duty to investigate public records and confirm permit status for residential properties. This is not incorrect, but statutory law does not completely absolve them of fiduciary duties to their clients, including an arising issue with permits violations in the state.
Huntington Ingalls, according to the Supreme Court of Vermont, suffered "direct physical damage" because employees infected with COVID had been physically present at the facilities and unintentionally spread the virus to employees who were not ill.
In uncertain times, and with employers facing liability from novel circumstances, EPLI coverage affords a policyholder the ability to offload much of this newly developing risk.
Though the thigh bone is connected to the hip bone, they are not the same thing.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has ruled that a waiver signed by an insured did not waive the right to aggregate or "stack" the limits of coverage for underinsured benefits between two separate policies of insurance.
The Arizona Supreme Court has reversed a ruling that allowed the family of a victim of a fatal car crash to pursue punitive damages against a trucking company, reasserting its holding in a 1986 decision that negligent acts alone are not sufficient to tack on extra damages.
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a lengthy opinion in In Re McDonald's Corporation Stockholder Derivative…
An insurer started to defend a company with an effective reservation of rights, but that ROR was found to be ineffective as to two officers of the company.