Reservation of Rights to Named Insured Found Ineffective Regarding Individual Insureds
An insurer started to defend a company with an effective reservation of rights, but that ROR was found to be ineffective as to two officers of the company.
March 04, 2019 at 07:00 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
March 4, 2019
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia found that a reservation of rights (ROR) issued to the named insured was ineffective as to two individual insureds who became defendants, who were not explicitly included in the original ROR. The case is Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Cribb, No. 2:17-CV-106-RWS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17785 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 2019).
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
FC&S Editors
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.