Court Rules 'Insured Location' Includes Two Addresses on Single Parcel of Land
The court found the potential for coverage because the policy at issue applied to two structures that were on the same, undivided parcel of land.
April 15, 2024 at 05:41 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that an insurer must defend an insured homeowner because, though the policyholder had two mailing addresses, both were on one parcel of land. The case is Homesite Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Howell, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230991 (W.D. Wash. 2023).
The Easement
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Kelly Helton, JD
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
When Fair Rental Value coverage is claimed, the property must be held for rental. What criteria is needed for a property to be considered held for rental?