X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review a pair of decisions out of the Minnesota Supreme Court which held that employers cannot be required to reimburse workers for marijuana used to treat on-the-job injuries because the substance is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The cases are Bierbach v. Digger’s Polaris and Musta v. Mendota Heights Dental Center et al, 965 N.W.2d 312 (Minn. 2021).

In both cases, a Workers’ Compensation Judge awarded the injured worker reimbursement for medicinal marijuana expenses incurred to treat their work-related injuries. In both cases, the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the Judge and declined to address the conflict of law between the Federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and Minnesota’s Medical Marijuana law (MCTRA), stating that the appeals court lacked the appropriate jurisdiction to address the conflict.

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: Firefighting Expenses and Coverage ›

When an insured and tenants help fight the fire, is there coverage for their efforts?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.