X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Our insured sold a vehicle to a customer who used a credit card. The credit card was later determined to be stolen so the bank reversed the transaction. It is my position that this is exactly what the attached endorsement (CA 25 03 False Pretense Coverage) is meant to cover. The carrier is suggesting that it is not covered because: b.(s) states false pretense coverage does not apply to a loss which, for any reason, a bank or other drawee fails to pay. The proximate cause of this loss is the false pretense. Would you agree with the carrier?

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When the Rug Needs to Dry ›

When the drying process of an oriental rug leads to damage, is there coverage?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.