X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

After seeking the opinion of the Texas Supreme Court on it’s interpretation of policy language, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has ruled that an insurer is not obligated to compensate a gold coin and precious metal dealer for the theft of more than $1 milion of gold coins obtained with fraudulent checks. The case is Dillon Gage v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, No. 20-10262, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4264 (5th Cir. Feb. 16, 2022).

In 2018, gold coin and precious metal dealer Dillon Gage Inc. separately shipped $549,999 and $655,000 worth of gold coins to a thief who forged signatures on stolen checks to pay for the coins. Dillon Gage did not ship the coins until after the checks had provisionally cleared. The coins were shipped to the address on the checks, but the thief rerouted the shipments on the UPS website prior to delivery and picked the packages up from a UPS facility.

Hannah Smith JD

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: Fancy Sunglasses - Jewelry or Not? ›

Are sunglasses with gemstones considered jewelry or other property?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.