Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
29 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Commercial General Liability
Content Type
Equipment Breakdown (Boiler and Machinery)
Legal Radar US states
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
When the policy documents contain a list of forms an endorsement may apply to, what does that mean in terms of coverages available?
An announcement from the Oklahoma Insurance Department identifies certain lines of business that are now exempt from form filing requirements.
An insurer's duty to contribute to another insurer's defense of a mutual client centered on whether the client had knowledge of the occurrences in the underlying suit.
The court debated whether an underlying suit based on environmental harms committed by a commercial property owner could be considered an "occurrence" that triggered the duties of defense and indemnity.
Even though a company contractor painted over the posters based on incorrect instructions, he still acted intentionally in doing so.
Coverage for subcontractors under an additional insured endorsement comes into question when the subcontractor's employee is injured in an accident.
TW: sexual assault. An insurer claimed it did not have to cover an insured bus company because there was only an incidental connection between the victim's injuries and the bus's use as a vehicle.
The owner of a nightclub claimed coverage was owed for an underlying personal injury action because it made claims against both the nightclub owner and the third-party security guard hired by the nightclub.
Three strip clubs sought coverage for a state-court judgment from Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company.
An email from the plaintiff to the defendant expressed disappointment and made a request based on that disappointment, but there was no demand for relief, monetary or otherwise.