Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
16 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Commercial Lines
Content Type
Lit Watch (16)
A commercial property policyholder had not complied with all of the policy conditions before the property was damaged in a fire.
Southwest Airlines spent more than $35 million in compensating customers affected by a system failure in 2016.
The policy required a written notice be sent to the insurer's claims department, but the insured emailed notice to the insurer's underwriting division. This led to less than satisfactory consequences for the insured.
The judges acknowledged the policyholder had had a string of bad luck, but even the worst of luck cannot overcome policy conditions.
The court was faced with the question of whether two robberies carried out by two seemingly different groups constituted a single occurrence or multiple occurrences.
Even though a company contractor painted over the posters based on incorrect instructions, he still acted intentionally in doing so.
Coverage for a fire loss was conditioned on the presence of certain fire protection systems "in complete working order."
A federal lawsuit over a grandiose fraud scheme involving forgery and bogus policies has named one of the oldest insurance agencies in Texas as a defendant.
The ambiguity in a catch-all exclusion could not be resolved using the principle of ejusdem generis.
If there is potential for coverage, the insurer must defend.