Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
1,108 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Content Type
Historical Lit Watch (1108)
Directors and Officers Liability (D&O)
Equipment Breakdown (Boiler and Machinery)
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
Additional Insured Coverage and Contractual Assumption of Liability By Don Malecki From the August 2014 issue of Claims Magazine When it…
Minor league teams began filing their own suits earlier this year and also seem to be proceeding with similar types of lawsuits.
Duties After a Loss By Christine G. Barlow, CPCU From the January 2015 issue of Claims Magazine Every insurance policy has things in common,…
Is a poisonous spider bite suffered at work compensable under workers' compensation?
Injured Pedestrian not "Insured" under Father's UM Policy In Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2008 WL 2131345 (Minn.), a pedestrian who…
A case involving intentional acts, negligence and severability.
Capitol Specialty Insurance v. JBC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.: Insurer filed for a declaratory judgment as to whether the general liability policy covered negligence claims by a customer who was shot at the insured's premises.
The Illinois Supreme Court has once again corrected an error of insurance policy interpretation by the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District and held that the mechanical device exclusion in the policy in question was not ambiguous.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One decided this week that all persons engaged in the business of insurance, including individual adjusters, may be liable for bad faith and violating Washington's Consumer Protection Act, whether or not there is a contractual relationship between the parties.
Litigators overcame multiple obstacles in securing a favorable verdict for a Gwinnett County, Georgia woman injured in a collision with a truck driver.