Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
153 total results Advanced Search Filter This Search
Your Alert Has Been Created. You will receive email alerts daily. Edit Preferences
Content Type
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
A split-usage personal auto model would account for the split role a car operator plays, shifting between driver and technical supervisor.
The victim sued the bank in a premises-liability action after he was shot in the head on bank premises after banking hours.
The perpetrator of a data breach interfered to the point where the owner of a stolen email address could communicate with clients in an effective, efficient manner.
A federal lawsuit over a grandiose fraud scheme involving forgery and bogus policies has named one of the oldest insurance agencies in Texas as a defendant.
State Farm has filed suit against several chiropractors and medical providers claiming they have perpetuated fraud for the last 8 years, costing policyholders millions of dollars.
A New Orleans restaurant will be allowed to proceed with an insurance lawsuit after the court found a plausible ambiguity in the applicable insurance policy.
According to a Verizon report, "[t]he major change this year with regard to action types was Ransomware coming out like a champ and grabbing third place in breaches (appearing in 10% of them, more than doubling its frequency from last year)."
The employer claimed the man's injuries weren't compensable because he had not arrived at the employer's premises at the time of injury. The man asserted he was performing work-related duties as assigned and directed by the employer when the collision occurred.
The ambiguity in a catch-all exclusion could not be resolved using the principle of ejusdem generis.
The 4th Circuit has ruled that damage caused by a watermain break that was concurrent with a flood is subject to a flood sublimit under an "anti-concurrent" causation clause in the property policy.