Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts reversed a lower court’s judgment in favor of an insurance company, finding a single push in an unprovoked attack by the insured did not preclude coverage relating to the term “physical abuse” in the context of the abuse and molestation exclusion.

In Dorchester Mutual Insurance Company v. Miville, 2023 Mass. LEXIS 84 (Mass. 2023), the justices unanimously reversed a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Dorchester Mutual Insurance Co., after the insured, 30-year-old William Brengle, initiated an unprovoked attack on Leonard Miville, 61, by punching him in the head and repeatedly kicking him, causing serious injuries.


Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: Date of Loss or Date of Assessment ›

When loss assessment language refers to an event, is the event the date of loss, or the date of the assessment?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.