Personal Umbrella Policy Not Required to Defend or Indemnify False Imprisonment Charge
"The trial court found that the plaintiffs satisfied their burden of establishing ... that the false imprisonment arose out of the defendant’s business pursuits, and that the business pursuits exclusion bars coverage," the opinion said.
April 03, 2023 at 05:04 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Connecticut Supreme Court determined that Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. did not have to compensate a business owner under a personal umbrella insurance policy for liability over his false imprisonment of his employee at work.
This is the second time the state Supreme Court has seen this case.
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.
When an association policy is nonrenewed and the new policy is substantially more so that unit owners are assessed for the increase in premium, can they file a claim under their loss assessment coverage for the increase?