X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

I am looking for some direction to see if the insurer is correct in their assessment that they will not pay for a situation where a wood chipper type machine was worked on by an employee who changed out the teeth on the machine – claiming mechanical breakdown exclusion. I need to find some assessment that the insurer is correct or if there are similar situations or even case law. Anything would be appreciated.

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When a Kayak Falls, Which Coverage Applies? ›

When personal property damages an auto, which policy applies?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2022 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.