X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Texas Supreme Court has issued a proinsurer ruling in a case over coverage for the theft of gold coins worth more than $1 million in which fraudulent checks were used to scam a dealer.  The case is Dillon Gage Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. EE1701590, No. 21-0312, 2021 Tex. Lexis 1125 (Dec. 3, 2021).

The Texas high court was handed two certified questions by a federal appeals court. In answering those questions, the court said that the policy wording should be interpreted to mean that an exclusion and a sublimit applied and that the alleged negligence of the third party that shipped the goods did not allow for an additional claim.

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

Hannah Smith JD

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When the Rug Needs to Dry ›

When the drying process of an oriental rug leads to damage, is there coverage?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.