X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has reversed a lower court’s decision and held that an insurer was obligated to compensate a man injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by its policyholders’ intoxicated employee because she had permission to use the vehicle. The case is McGee v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7611.

Underwood Bros Inc., doing business as AAA Landscape was insured with a general insurance policy from Zurich American Insurance Company. The policy provided coverage for auto accidents, and defined an insured as anyone “using with your permission a covered ‘auto’ you own.”

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When a Broken Pipe Runs the Well Dry ›

When a broken pipe discharges enough water to run the well dry, is there coverage for digging a new well?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.