X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court reversed the ruling of the Business and Consumer Court of Maine and held that an insurer failed to adequately inform a wood pellet mill operator that it was not renewing its coverage in connection with payment for a fire that caused $15 million in damages. The case is Corinth Pellets, LLC v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co. et al. 

Arch Capital Group Ltd. unit Arch Specialty Insurance Co. issued a surplus lines policy to Corinth Pellets LLC. The policy covered property loss, business interruption, and extra expenses for an initial term of January 2017 to January 2018. Coverage was subsequently extended for three consecutive three-month terms, to September 18, 2018.

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When a Broken Pipe Runs the Well Dry ›

When a broken pipe discharges enough water to run the well dry, is there coverage for digging a new well?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.