X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Summary:   This article presents an analysis of the Montrose decision and the known loss doctrine that is related to that decision. Mr. Randy J. Maniloff is the author of this article. Mr. Maniloff is at time of writing, the Chair of the Insurance Coverage Group at Philadelphia-based Christie, Pabarue, Mortensen, and Young, P.C., where he concentrates his practice in the representation of insurers in coverage disputes. Mr. Maniloff handles a wide variety of insurance coverage matters in both the litigation and non-litigation arenas, including environmental property damage, toxic tort bodily injury/asbestos, construction defect, mold, general liability (products and premises), professional liability, directors and officers liability, media liability, public officials liability, homeowners, first-party property, and health care (including managed care and community associations).

The author expresses his sincere appreciation to Mr. Brad Mortensen for his invaluable assistance in the preparation of this article. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and are not necessarily those of his firm, its clients, or the FC&S Bulletins.

Note: This article originally published on November 24, 2008, with interdocument links updated on October 21, 2020.

Topics covered:

Introduction

CGL form and known loss

Montrose decision and the CGL form

Does Montrose alter CGL coverage?

Known loss doctrine

Known loss provision in the CGL insuring agreement

Common law and the Montrose endorsement

Known loss and a non-continuous trigger claim

Notice of bodily injury or property damage to whom and when?

Conclusion

Introduction

Insurance is about one thing—claims. Many other aspects of an insurance company are critical to its success, but the fact remains that they are still only supporting characters. And no discussion about claims can start anywhere but one place—the words contained in the insurance policy, or coverage form. Of course, not all policy forms are equal in their significance. However, in the property-casualty world, there can be little doubt that, at or near the top of the forms food chain are Insurance Services Office, Inc.’s (ISO) commercial general liability coverage form—CG 00 01 and American Association of Insurance Services (AAIS) commercial liability coverage form—GL-200 Ed. 1.0. These two documents are the backbone of liability insurance in America . For a substantial number of policyholders, they set out what is covered (the insuring agreements), what is not (exclusions), for how much (limits of liability), how the parties” relationship shall be governed (conditions) and what certain terms mean (definitions).

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Request a Free Trial today to enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Trusted, quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: Cross Suits Exclusion ›

Discusses the impact of the cross suits exclusion in excluding all inter-company suits.

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.