The Case that Keeps on Giving: Montrose v. The California Supreme Court
After 31 years of litigation, the California Supreme Court has finally issued what has been deemed another groundbreaking ruling.
April 16, 2020 at 01:00 AM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Editors Note: There was an error in the first version of this story that has now been corrected.
In a decision described as a major victory for policyholders, the California Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that policyholders do not always have to first exhaust all of their primary coverage over different policy periods in order to access excess coverage for certain years. The case is Montrose Chem. Corp. of Cal. v. Superior Court, No. S244737, 2020 Cal. LEXIS 2095 (Apr. 6, 2020).
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.