X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Sixth Circuit has ruled that a homeowner cannot reasonably interpret an ACV endorsement to his policy as creating additional coverage for damage to his roof from a windstorm. The case is Richelson v. Liberty Ins. Corp., No. 19-3035, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 862 (6th Cir. Jan. 6, 2020).

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Request a Free Trial today to enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Trusted, quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email customerservice@nuco.com.

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: Humidity In The Health Club ›

Discusses the effects of humidity over time and how it affects coverage under the policy.

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.