X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

April 1, 2019

The Supreme Court of Nevada took a minority standpoint when they determined that an insurer’s liability is not capped at policy limits and defense costs when an insurer breaches it’s duty to defend. Instead, the insurer might be liable for consequential damages caused by the breach even if it did not act in bad faith. The case is Century Sur. Co. v. Andrew,432 P. 3d 180 (Nev. 2018).

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

FC&S Editors

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When the Rug Needs to Dry ›

When the drying process of an oriental rug leads to damage, is there coverage?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.