X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

May 12, 2014

 The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a potentially responsible party (PRP) letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the insured under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act was a “suit” within the meaning of the insured’s commercial general liability (CGL) policies. This case is Land O’ Lakes, Inc., v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau, 728 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2013).

This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts

Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.

Question of the Week

Insurance Coverage Q&A: When a Broken Pipe Runs the Well Dry ›

When a broken pipe discharges enough water to run the well dry, is there coverage for digging a new well?

Question of the Week Archive ›

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.