A Potentially Responsible Party Letter Triggers the Duty to Defend
A Potentially Responsible Party Letter Triggers the Duty to Defend.
Updated on May 14, 2014
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
May 12, 2014
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a potentially responsible party (PRP) letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the insured under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act was a “suit” within the meaning of the insured’s commercial general liability (CGL) policies. This case isLand O’ Lakes, Inc., v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau, 728 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2013).
This premium content is locked for
FC&S Expert Coverage Interpretation subscribers.
Request a Free Trial today to enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
Trusted, quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Get Answers Directly From the FC&S Experts
Submit your coverage interpretation question to the editors of FC&S for quick and reliable information.